New top story on Hacker News: Show HN: Maestro – A Framework to Orchestrate and Ground Competing AI Models
Show HN: Maestro – A Framework to Orchestrate and Ground Competing AI Models
3 by defqon1 | 0 comments on Hacker News.
ive spent the past few months designing a framework for orchestrating multiple large language models in parallel — not to choose the “best,” but to let them argue, mix their outputs, and preserve dissent structurally. It’s called Maestro heres the whitepaper https://ift.tt/jfazy12 (Narrative version here: https://ift.tt/UDs5ck3... ) Core ideas: Prompts are dispatched to multiple LLMs (e.g., GPT-4, Claude, open-source models) The system compares their outputs and synthesizes them It never resolves into a single voice — it ends with a 66% rule: 2 votes for a primary output, 1 dissent preserved Human critics and analog verifiers can be triggered for physical-world confirmation (when claims demand grounding) The feedback loop learns not only from right/wrong outputs, but from what kind of disagreements lead to deeper truth Maestro isn’t a product or API — it’s a proposal for an open, civic layer of synthetic intelligence. It’s designed for epistemic integrity and resistance to centralized control. Would love thoughts, critiques, or collaborators.
3 by defqon1 | 0 comments on Hacker News.
ive spent the past few months designing a framework for orchestrating multiple large language models in parallel — not to choose the “best,” but to let them argue, mix their outputs, and preserve dissent structurally. It’s called Maestro heres the whitepaper https://ift.tt/jfazy12 (Narrative version here: https://ift.tt/UDs5ck3... ) Core ideas: Prompts are dispatched to multiple LLMs (e.g., GPT-4, Claude, open-source models) The system compares their outputs and synthesizes them It never resolves into a single voice — it ends with a 66% rule: 2 votes for a primary output, 1 dissent preserved Human critics and analog verifiers can be triggered for physical-world confirmation (when claims demand grounding) The feedback loop learns not only from right/wrong outputs, but from what kind of disagreements lead to deeper truth Maestro isn’t a product or API — it’s a proposal for an open, civic layer of synthetic intelligence. It’s designed for epistemic integrity and resistance to centralized control. Would love thoughts, critiques, or collaborators.
Comments
Post a Comment